登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
出版Universität, 2023
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=1aVd0AEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋Abstract: Purpose
Clinical checklists are the standard of care to determine whether a child with cancer shows indications for genetic testing. Nevertheless, the efficacy of these tests to reliably detect genetic cancer predisposition in children with cancer is still insufficiently investigated.

Methods
We assessed the validity of clinically recognizable signs to identify cancer predisposition by correlating a state-of-the-art clinical checklist to the corresponding exome sequencing analysis in an unselected single-center cohort of 139 child-parent data sets.

Results
In total, one-third of patients had a clinical indication for genetic testing according to current recommendations, and 10.1% (14 of 139) of children harbored a cancer predisposition. Of these, 71.4% (10 of 14) were identified through the clinical checklist. In addition, >2 clinical findings in the checklist increased the likelihood to identifying genetic predisposition from 12.5% to 50%. Furthermore, our data revealed a high rate of genetic predisposition (40%, 4 of 10) in myelodysplastic syndrome cases, while no (likely) pathogenic variants were identified in the sarcoma and lymphoma group.

Conclusion
In summary, our data show high checklist sensitivity, particularly in identifying childhood cancer predisposition syndromes. Nevertheless, the checklist used here also missed 29% of children with a cancer predisposition, highlighting the drawbacks of sole clinical evaluation and underlining the need for routine germline sequencing in pediatric oncology