登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
Representation Rights and the Burger Years
Nancy Maveety
出版
University of Michigan Press
, 1991-08-16
主題
Law / General
LAW / Constitutional
Law / Jurisprudence
LAW / Public
Law / Election Law
Political Science / General
Political Science / History & Theory
Political Science / Political Process / General
Political Science / Constitutions
Political Science / American Government / Judicial Branch
ISBN
9780472102273
0472102273
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=3u2p10kpZdUC&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBook
SAMPLE
註釋
In
Representation Rights and the Burger Years
, political scientist Nancy Maveety tackles the constitutional meaning of "fair and effective" representation rights and evaluates the specific contributions that the Supreme Court made to this definition during the Burger era. The Court of Chief Justice Warren Burger has been described as one that made no distinctive jurisprudential contributions. It has been dismissed as a court overshadowed by both its predecessor and its successor. By contrast, Maveety argues that the Burger Court in fact revolutionized constitutional understandings of political representation, expanding, in particular, the judicial scrutiny of political institutions. Moving beyond the "one person, one vote" reapportionment initiated by the Warren Court, it opened the way for the articulation of group-based constitutional representation rights. This group-based approach to representation questions broadened groups' constitutional claims to equal political influence. Yet, as Maveety perceptively shows, this broader interpretation of "representable interests" was grounded in mainstream American conceptions of political representation. The great value of Maveety's study is the presentation of a "typology of group representation," which explains and validates the Burger Court's work on representation rights. This typology, drawn from American history, political theory, and political practice, offers a new approach for evaluating the precedental record of the Burger years and a sophisticated framework for understanding the interaction between constitutional law and politics.