登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
ComOn-coaching
Marcelo Niglio de Figueiredo
Lorena Jasmin Krippeit
Gabriele Ihorst
Heribert Sattel
Carma L. Bylund
Andreas Joos
Jürgen Bengel
Claas Lahmann
Kurt Fritzsche
Alexander Wünsch
其他書名
The Effect of a Varied Number of Coaching Sessions on Transfer Into Clinical Practice Following Communication Skills Training in Oncology
出版
PLOS
, 2018
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=97WywgEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋
Abstract: Objective
To investigate the effect of the number of coaching sessions after communication skills training on the medical communicative performance of oncologists in clinical practice.
Methods/Design
The training, consisting of a workshop and one (control group) vs. four (intervention group) sessions of individual coaching, was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants included physicians working in any setting where patients with oncological diseases were treated. Real medical consultations were video recorded at three time points: before the workshop (t0), after the workshop (t1) and after completion of coaching (t2). The 1.5-day workshop was based on role-playing in small groups; in the coaching sessions, the videos recorded at t1 were analyzed in detail by both the trainer and the physician. The coaching sessions were manualized and based on the physician's learning goals. The primary hypothesis was that the intervention group would improve to a higher extent than the control group, as assessed by external raters using rating scales specially developed for this project. Physicians were stratified for sex and setting and randomized by an independent statistician. The group assignment was revealed for physicians and trainers at the end of the workshop, while the raters were blinded to group assignments and assessment points.
Results
A total of 72 physicians participated in one of 8 workshops and could be allocated to either the control or intervention group. The intervention group showed a statistically significant improvement (ES d = 0.41, p.01) in the All items domain of the rating scales between t1 and t2 and showed a significant advantage compared with the CG (ES = .41, p = .04). The impact on diverse specified skills was heterogeneous; a larger sample is necessary for more detailed analysis.brbrConclusions