登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
Force Planning Scenarios, 1945-2016
Eric V. Larson
其他書名
Their Origins and Use in Defense Strategic Planning
出版
RAND Corporation
, 2019
主題
History / Military / Strategy
Political Science / Security (National & International)
Political Science / Political Freedom
Technology & Engineering / Military Science
ISBN
197740099X
9781977400994
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=Hj1_yAEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋
"This report describes the forces that shaped conventional ground force planning during the 1945-2016 period, with an emphasis on the strategic concepts and contingency scenarios used. It identifies broader lessons that are likely to be of interest to contemporary force planners, especially those related to the strategic concepts to help connect basic national security policies with the planning and development of conventional ground forces, and provides the context for consideration of different combinations of force planning scenarios. Finally, the report identifies potential opportunities for the U.S. Army to influence the future selection of defense planning scenarios. Historically, U.S. global interests and commitments have been sufficiently expansive that it was impossible to design a fiscally acceptable force that could defend all U.S. interests simultaneously: Efforts to estimate the forces required to simultaneously defend all U.S. interests have typically led to force structure estimates twice as large as more-realistic, budget-informed planning approaches. The report demonstrates that Cold War-era strategic concepts and scenarios for planning conventional forces focused on the capabilities, intentions, posture, and plans of the USSR and China. In the post-Cold War era, Northeast and Southwest Asian and terrorist threat scenarios have predominated. The analysis shows that the scenarios that have been used in defense planning have been derived from each administration's prior conclusions about the relative importance of national security interests, and threats and challenges to these interests; national security policies and strategies; and the strategic concepts that have provided a framework for relating military forces to strategic ends" -- Publisher's web site.
