登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
Covenanted Solidarity
Mark R. Lindsay
其他書名
The Theological Basis of Karl Barth's Opposition to Nazi Antisemitism and the Holocaust
出版Peter Lang, 2001
主題Biography & Autobiography / GeneralHistory / GeneralHistory / Ancient / GreeceHistory / Europe / GeneralHistory / Europe / EasternHistory / Europe / WesternHistory / Europe / FranceHistory / Europe / GermanyHistory / Europe / Great Britain / GeneralHistory / Europe / ItalyHistory / Study & TeachingHistory / Modern / GeneralHistory / Europe / Austria & HungaryHistory / Modern / 20th Century / HolocaustHistory / Europe / SpainHistory / Social HistoryPhilosophy / GeneralPhilosophy / History & Surveys / ModernReligion / Christianity / HistoryReligion / Institutions & OrganizationsReligion / Judaism / GeneralReligion / Christian Ministry / MissionsReligion / PhilosophyReligion / Christian Theology / GeneralReligion / Christian Theology / EcclesiologyReligion / Christian Theology / SystematicReligion / Christianity / GeneralReligion / Antiquities & ArchaeologyReligion / Christian Ministry / PreachingReligion / TheologyReligion / Christian Church / GeneralReligion / Christian Church / History
ISBN08204519169780820451916
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=I-jYAAAAMAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋This new work by Australian scholar Mark R. Lindsay explores the controversial issue of whether and how the Swiss theologian Karl Barth responded to the antisemitic policies of Nazi Germany. Drawing on, and arguing against, recent debates within the fields of Barthian, Holocaust, and Kirchenkampf literature, Lindsay argues that not only were Barth's political actions in thoroughgoing opposition to both the Nazi regime and its inherent antisemitism, but that this stance was firmly based on his dogmatic theology, in particular, the Church Dogmatics. On the basis of his interpretation of Barth's theology and its particular political expressions (such as the 1934 Barmen Declaration), Lindsay rejects the commonly held assumption that Barth was indifferent to the Jewish plight and suggests that his resistance was at least as comprehensive as Dietrich Bonhoeffer's.