Jerub-baal Redivivus: Or An Essay Towards a Clear Resolution Of Five Seasonable Queries, Viz I. What is it which May Warrant, and Acquit from Schism, a Persons Non- Communion with the Church of England In, the Worship (alleadged to Be) Ministred by Her Liturgy of Common-Prayer? II. What is it which May Waarrant, and Acquit from Schism, a Persons Non- Communion with the Church of England, in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, Under the Present Mode, Manner and Method of Administration? III. Whether the Liturgy of the Church of England, Being (supposed to Be) Vnlawful, People May (yet) Lawfully Communicate in the Service Or Worship (said to Be) Thereby Exhibited? IV. Whether One May be Lawfully Present in Time of Common-Prayer, who (yet) Cannot Lawfully Communicate In, Or by It? V. Whether the Oath Called the Colemn League and Covenant (supposed to be (as Yet) in Force, and Obligatory) Could Oblige Or Bind Against Communion in Common-Prayer? In Defence of the Humble Remonstrance to Mr. Croftons Plea for Commu- Nion &c. Against the Reply (groundlesly) Entituled, Jerub-baal Justified
