登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
That Could Be Us
Thomas Jamieson
Douglas A Van Belle
其他書名
News Media, Politics, and the Necessary Conditions for Disaster Risk Reduction
出版
University of Michigan Press
, 2022-03-14
主題
Political Science / Public Affairs & Administration
Political Science / Public Policy / General
Social Science / General
Social Science / Sociology / General
Social Science / Disasters & Disaster Relief
Social Science / Media Studies
ISBN
0472132997
9780472132997
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=NH5dEAAAQBAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBook
SAMPLE
註釋
The evidence presented in this book suggests that when the necessary conditions for disaster risk reduction (DRR) are in place, it is possible for elected officials to pursue DRR policies in their rational self-interest. As such, when the media makes it possible through lesson-drawing coverage of distant disasters, DRR policies become much more likely in observing communities because elected officials can seize the opportunity to both make political gains and protect their constituents. Authors Thomas Jamieson and Douglas A. Van Belle provide reasons for optimism about the prospect of DRR in at-risk communities around the world—observing communities are able to learn from the experiences of stricken areas and pursue policies that ultimately save lives and reduce economic damage from disasters.
In
That Could Be
Us
, Jamieson and Van Belle find that the news media delivers information to observing communities in a form that enables learning from other disasters. Experimental evidence shows that people react to this information in a way that would punish leaders who do not back DRR efforts. Case studies, interviews, experiments, and illustrative examples suggest that leaders and political entrepreneurs heed this public demand, react to news media coverage, and act accordingly. Taken as a whole, this suggests that the policy and research implications derived from this book’s theoretical model are worthy of further exploration, particularly in terms of how they might resolve the puzzle presented by the variations in DRR policy uptake around the world that do not seem to be driven by developmental differences across communities.