登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
Media and the Mind
Matthew Daniel Eddy
其他書名
Art, Science, and Notebooks as Paper Machines, 1700-1830
出版
University of Chicago Press
, 2023-07-11
主題
History / General
History / Modern / 18th Century
History / Europe / Great Britain / Scotland
Science / History
ISBN
0226820750
9780226820750
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=RrDBEAAAQBAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBook
SAMPLE
註釋
A beautifully illustrated argument that reveals notebooks as extraordinary paper machines that transformed knowledge on the page and in the mind.
We often think of reason as a fixed entity, as a definitive body of facts that do not change over time. But during the Enlightenment, reason also was seen as a process, as a set of skills enacted on a daily basis. How, why, and where were these skills learned? Concentrating on Scottish students living during the long eighteenth century, this book argues that notebooks were paper machines and that notekeeping was a capability-building exercise that enabled young notekeepers to mobilize everyday handwritten and printed forms of material and visual media in a way that empowered them to judge and enact the enlightened principles they encountered in the classroom. Covering a rich selection of material ranging from simple scribbles to intricate watercolor diagrams, the book reinterprets John Locke’s comparison of the mind to a blank piece of paper, the
tabula rasa
. Although one of the most recognizable metaphors of the British Enlightenment, scholars seldom consider why it was so successful for those who used it. Each chapter uses one core notekeeping skill to reveal the fascinating world of material culture that enabled students in the arts, sciences, and humanities to transform the
tabula rasa
metaphor into a dynamic cognitive model. Starting in the home, moving to schools, and ending with universities, the book reconstructs the relationship between media and the mind from the bottom up. It reveals that the cognitive skills required to make and use notebooks were not simply aids to reason; rather, they were part of reason itself.