登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
其他書名
Competing Approaches to Inform the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution System
出版RAND Corporation, 2017
主題Business & Economics / InfrastructureBusiness & Economics / Facility ManagementHistory / Military / GeneralHistory / Military / United StatesHistory / Military / Aviation & SpacePolitical Science / Public Policy / Economic PolicyTechnology & Engineering / Civil / GeneralTechnology & Engineering / Military Science
ISBN083309677X9780833096777
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=Tu5qnQAACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋"The Air Force civil engineering community has found that its methods for articulating infrastructure funding needs and mission impacts in the Program Objective Memorandum (POM) process are insufficient, and it is in the process of investigating alternatives. This analysis explores the relationship between Air Force infrastructure management and mission capability and risk. The goal is to identify methodological approaches and data requirements for articulating and quantifying these links and enabling the Air Force to answer the question: What is the effect of funding infrastructure below stated requirements? The authors identified three alternative approaches for answering the above question: a project scorecard approach, an approach based on mission outcome metrics, and an approach based on composite risk metrics. In this report, the authors assess the strengths, weaknesses, and relative implementation burden of each approach, and they explore ways to mitigate the weaknesses of each approach to make them most useful in the Air Force context. Finally, they identify steps the Air Force can take to implement these concepts and to improve its ability to develop a systematic, evidence-based case for sustainment, restoration, and modernization funding within the POM process more generally."--Publisher's description