登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
No Accident, Comrade
Steven Belletto
其他書名
Chance and Design in Cold War American Narratives
出版Oxford University Press, 2012
主題History / North AmericaHistory / Modern / 20th Century / GeneralLiterary Collections / American / African American & BlackLiterary Criticism / GeneralLiterary Criticism / American / GeneralLiterary Criticism / Subjects & Themes / PoliticsSocial Science / Customs & Traditions
ISBN01993543599780199354351
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=cXoTDAAAQBAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBookSAMPLE
註釋No Accident, Comrade argues that chance became a complex yet conflicted cultural signifier during the Cold War, when a range of thinkers—politicians, novelists, historians, biologists, sociologists, and others—contended that totalitarianism denied the very existence and operation of chance in the world. They claimed that the USSR perpetrated a vast fiction on its population, a fiction amplified by the Soviet view that there is no such thing as chance or accident, only manifestations of historical law (hence the popular American refrain used to refer to Marxism: "It was no accident, Comrade"). By reading an expansive range of American novels published between 1947-2005, alongside nonfiction texts by the likes of Jerzy Kosinski, Daniel Bell, Ian Hacking, and mid-century game theorists, No Accident, Comrade explains how associations of chance with democratic freedom and the denial of chance with totalitarianism circulated in Cold War America. Chance became tied to the liberties of U.S. democracy, whereas its eradication or denial became symptomatic of Soviet tyranny. With works by Nabokov, Ellison, Pynchon, Didion, DeLillo, Colson Whitehead, and many others, Steven Belletto shows how writers developed innovative strategies for dealing with and incorporating these ever-present beliefs about chance and its role in their culture. These newly developed narrative techniques allowed them to theorize, satirize, and make sense of the constantly changing relationship between the individual and the state during a largely rhetorical conflict.