登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
其他書名
Proceedings of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Vienna 1998 "Capitalism and Socialism in the 21st Century"
出版Springer Science & Business Media, 2001
主題Biography & Autobiography / Social Scientists & PsychologistsBusiness & Economics / GeneralBusiness & Economics / EconometricsBusiness & Economics / Free Enterprise & CapitalismBusiness & Economics / Development / Economic DevelopmentBusiness & Economics / Economics / GeneralBusiness & Economics / Economics / TheoryPolitical Science / GeneralPolitical Science / Political Ideologies / Communism, Post-Communism & SocialismPolitical Science / Political Ideologies / DemocracyPolitical Science / History & TheoryPolitical Science / GlobalizationPolitical Science / Political Ideologies / CapitalismSocial Science / Future Studies
ISBN37908135089783790813500
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=ddq9ZpNq_oEC&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBookSAMPLE
註釋Joseph Schumpeter oscillated in his view about the type of economic system that was most conducive to growth. In his 1911 treatise, Schumpeter argued that a more decentralized and turbulent industry structure where the pro cess of creative destruction was triggered by vigorous entrepreneurial ac tivity was the engine of economic growth. But by 1942 Schumpeter had modified his theory, arguing instead that a more centralized and stable industry structure was more conducive to growth. According to Schum peter (1942, p. 132), under the managed economy there was little room for entrepreneurship because, "Innovation itself is being reduced to routine. Technological progress is increasingly becoming the business of teams of trained specialists who turn out what is required to make it work in pre dictable ways" (p. 132). Schumpeter (1942) reversed his earlier view by arguing that the integration of knowledge creation and appropriation be stowed an inherent innovative advantage upon giant corporations, "Since capitalist enterprise, by its very achievements, tends to automize progress, we conclude that it tends to make itself superfluous - to break to pieces under the pressure of its own success.