登入
選單
返回
Google圖書搜尋
An Evaluation of the Department of Defense's Excess Property Program
Aaron C. Davenport
Jonathan William Welburn
Andrew Lauland
Annelise Pietenpol
Marc L. Robbins
Erin Rebhan
Patricia M. Boren
Kevin Jack Riley
其他書名
Law Enforcement Agency Equipment Acquisition Policies, Findings, and Options
出版
RAND Corporation
, 2018
主題
History / Military / General
History / Military / United States
Law / Criminal Law / General
Political Science / International Relations / General
Political Science / American Government / General
Political Science / American Government / Judicial Branch
ISBN
197740071X
9781977400710
URL
http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=l2FutwEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋
The Defense Logistics Agency’s (DLA’s) Law Enforcement Support Office (LESO) provides excess Department of Defense property—everything from desks to rifles to airplanes—to local, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies (LEAs) across the United States. Because of the sensitive nature of some of the material transferred to LEAs, LESO has been the subject of congressional, Government Accountability Office, and public scrutiny for almost two decades. Recent events—including the 2014 Ferguson, Missouri, protests—increased interest in the program. Opponents of the program argued that LESO was at least partially responsible for what they perceived to be an increased militarization of the police, while proponents believed that this program not only made police and citizens safer but exemplified good stewardship of taxpayer dollars. The 2017 National Defense Authorization Act required an evaluation of the LESO program, which provides thousands of LEAs with millions of dollars of excess property annually. The authors of this report find that LESO manages an efficient program that effectively reuses excess property, benefits the law enforcement community, responds diligently to oversight, and is faithful to congressional intent. However, these efforts are unlikely to resolve perceptions that the program contributes to the militarization of police. Defining what is or is not appropriate militarization of police forces and addressing concerns of how the excess property is employed and its effect on community policing is beyond the authority of DLA. This report presents three optional paths ahead.