登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
Agricultural Policy in Europe
Alan Greer
出版Manchester University Press, 2005-05-20
主題Business & Economics / Industries / AgribusinessPolitical Science / GeneralPolitical Science / International Relations / GeneralPolitical Science / Public Policy / Environmental PolicyPolitical Science / Public Policy / Agriculture & Food PolicySocial Science / Agriculture & Food
ISBN071906029X9780719060298
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=n9PupYDyQA0C&hl=&source=gbs_api
EBookSAMPLE
註釋Agricultural Policy in Europe provides a unique comparative analysis of the U.K., France, Poland, the Netherlands, Greece and Ireland, using up-to-date material on C.A.P. reform, world trade liberalisation, animal disease, rural development and the environment. In its core argument that Europe has a Common Agricultural Policy in name only, the study offers a distinctive interpretation of contemporary policies for agriculture and rural development. Policy is considerably more diverse than usually recognised, and also varies across different policy stages such as agenda setting, formulation and implementation. This diversity is the result of a multilevel policy process in which global, regional and local actors play a key role alongside the institutions of the E.U. Yet nation states are central. Despite the existence of the C.A.P., substantial policy variations reflect different national economies, cultures, priorities and interests, usually mediated through different types of policy networks. Far from greater policy integration, the pressures for diversity have increased in recent years, notably through world trade liberalisation, environmental concern and E.U. enlargement. With continuing controversy about the future direction and powers of the E.U., this groundbreaking book sheds new light on the extent to which agricultural policy in Europe is common. It goes beyond formal legal structures and the rhetoric of popular debate to look at what actually happens in a complex policy process that is both multilevel and multi stage. The result is a very different picture in which agricultural policy is considerably more diverse and fragmented than usually assumed.