登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
Europe and Nuclear Disarmament
Harald Müller
其他書名
Debates and Political Attitudes in 16 European Countries
出版European Interuniversity Press, 1998
主題History / Military / GeneralLaw / GeneralLaw / JurisprudencePolitical Science / International Relations / Arms ControlPolitical Science / History & TheoryPolitical Science / Security (National & International)Political Science / Public Affairs & Administration
ISBN90520170269789052017020
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=nPKOAAAAMAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋During the Cold War, Europe - at both sides of the Iron Curtain - was the area with the highest concentration of nuclear weapons in the world. These weapons were integrated into the security policies and military strategies of either side and would have probably used early in a military confrontation. The revolution of 1989/1991 has changed the parameters of European security completely. The huge conventional forces of the Warsaw Treaty Organization have disappeared, the Soviet Union dissolved, as did the WTO. The rationale for keeping thousands of tactical nuclear weapons in Western Europe did thus no longer exist, and NATO reduced the number of these deployed weapons drastically.
Yet, nuclear weapons play still a role in Western as well as in Russian military strategy, and they have a major impact on the way NATO enlargement is viewed in Moscow in the ways Russia reacts to this process, even though NATO has declared not to station muclear arms in any of the new member states.
This is the framework within which the authors of this book inquire the thinking in European countries about nuclear weapons, security, arms control and disarmament. Their findings point to a considerable inertia of thinking. While in the United States, a major debate is under way to question the utility of nuclear weapons altogether and to explore possible pathes towards complete nuclear disarmament, such a debate is not discernible in Europe. Political elites are rather cautious; while they support the disarmament process in principle, and have clear ideas what the next steps might be, they are the more cautious the more far-reaching measures are proposed, and display considerable skepticism towards the ultimate goal of a world free of nuclear arms.