Execution of Sentences at the Level of International Tribunals and Courts:
Moving Beyond the Mere Protection of Procedural Rights and Minimal Fundamental
Interests?
Historically, little attention was paid to the execution of sentences passed
at the level of international courts and tribunals. Capital punishment was still
used, and custodial sanctions were imposed in the relevant states. It was not
until the 1990s, with the creation of the ad hoc tribunals, that the execution
of sentences also became a task for international tribunals, in cooperation
with, and by means of transferring the sentenced person to, a state which had
committed itself to executing the sentence. The basic principles of these
vertical transfer, or execution of sentence, procedures, as is also the case at
the level of the ICC, are characterized by a system logic, with a limited role
for the sentenced person. Nonetheless, minimal human rights and international
standards for the execution of sentences (as agreed upon at the level of the UN)
are respected.
The authors investigate if and to what extent the interests of the sentenced
person could be better pursued and enhanced during vertical procedures for the
execution of sentences; they therefore take a clear-cut rehabilitation and
social integration perspective.
Given the dominant representation of EU member states among states willing to
execute sentences passed by international tribunals and courts, the authors
moreover wonder whether practice should not evolve towards reflecting the
obligatory compliance of these states with, besides the UN standards, additional
(sometimes wider, more precise and higher) Council of Europe and EU standards.
This would be reflected in the policies of the tribunals and courts (especially
the ICC) relating to the conclusion of sentence execution agreements with
states, as well as in the actual case-based decisions in which particular
sentence execution states are chosen.
The authors further plead for the conclusion of a bilateral EU-ICC agreement
on the execution of sentences, since this would constitute an important
contribution to international justice, and one that is likely to make the
reintegration and rehabilitation of offenders (a greater) part of it.