登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
Wrongfulness in Delict
其他書名
A Response to Brand Ja
出版SSRN, 2014
URLhttp://books.google.com.hk/books?id=ojoQzwEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api
註釋In an article entitled “The contribution of Louis Harms in the sphere of Aquilian liability for pure economic loss” published in Essays in honour of Louis Harms 2013 THRHR 57-69, Brand JA takes issue with our statement in Neethling and Potgieter Neethling-Potgieter-Visser Law of delict (2010) 78 that “since Telematrix [(Pty) Ltd v Advertising Standards Authority SA 2006 1 SA 461 (SCA)] the Supreme Court of Appeal has been taking a new direction (especially in respect of pure economic loss)” with regard to the element of wrongfulness as a requirement for Aquilian liability. This note comprises our response to the view of Brand JA.