登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
註釋Because of his early silence on the issue, when Jacques Derrida is pressedconcerning "the materialist text" in Positions (1971), his response might seemenigmatic: If "matter in this general economy designates . . . radical alterity," then"what [he] write[s] can be considered 'materialist.'" Far from absent, materialitywill have been silently at work in Derrida, perhaps, from the beginning and ingeneral. (Indeed, in 1971--the year of the interview--Derrida delivered aseminar at the École normale supérieure fulfilling the "Matter [matière]" rubricfor the philosophy agrégation.) Even if, however, a certain material insistence canlead to a generalization of textuality in the deconstructive sense, Derrida at thesame time warns that even materialism often organizes itself around atranscendental signified and therefore always risks amounting to another, moredeeply entrenched because more apparently opposed, metaphysics. Such is thecase, traditionally speaking, of realism or empiricism. The dividing line thereforelies neither between the ideal and the material nor, for that matter, betweenmetaphysics and non-metaphysics. Accordingly, Derrida refuses to say that "theconcept of matter is in and of itself either metaphysical or nonmetaphysical"; aquestion, rather, of singular configurations in an uneven history, it "dependsupon the work to which it yields." theory@buffalo 18 includes essays by Gil Anidjar, Marc Crépon, David E. Johnson, Peggy Kamuf, Kelly Oliver, and Samuel Weber on thismaterial work in Derrida.