登入選單
返回Google圖書搜尋
EU Enlargement and Rural Development Policy : an Easy Case Or a Stumbling Block of the Accession Negotiations? : the Case of Slovenia
註釋The principle of social and economic cohesion is regarded highly in the EU policy agenda. Enlargement of the Union will bring about a major challenge to this principle, since it is known that the scope of inter-regional development inequalities is about to widen up strongly. This is evident especially in the field of rural development. As it is argued by various sources, rural conditions and trends in the Candidate Countries differ markedly from those in the existing EU-15. As it issubstantiated in the paper, the policy mechanisms, financial provisions and institutional framework that EU-15 has designed to tackle these problems do not entirely correspond to the rural conditions and possibilities in the CEECs, which implies the need for a thorough set of their adjustments. These considerations are elaborated in a wider scope through the case of Slovenia. With the accession process, the existing Slovene rural development policy concepts are challenged by a comprehensive EU policy framework. Rather than for a simple adaptation to this framework, Slovenia seeks for a designation of its own set of priorities and provision of a national administrative and financial framework that would match the corresponding EU structures. The key segments of rural development policy, which are analysed in greater detail, include farm restructuring, environmental and spatial aspects, restructuring of food-processing sector and sustainable adaptation ofrural areas. As a critical point in shaping an integrated set of rural development policy in Slovenia, a rather comprehensive conceptual confusion can be identified. It stems from factors, such as ill-defined institutional competences, shortcomings in organisational potential on regional/local levels, and limited and scattered financial capabilities. Setting-up of a comprehensive concept and effective policy mechanisms remains the key task that has not yet been satisfyingly resolved. The paper concludes with discussion whether the EU pre-accession assistance and the post-Agenda 2000 rural development policy mechanisms offer an adequate framework to tackle specific rural development problems in CEECs and in what extent do they contribute towards promotion of integrated rural development. It is argued that a greater effort should be stressed to the flexibility of programmes according to the specific country needs, simplification of rules and procedures and towards investment in human capital. However, with regard to the latest developments on this issue, a clear dichotomy can be perceived between the pre-enlargement objectives of the existing EU-15 member states and the CEECs, leading to a possibility of policy failures also in the later stages after accession. The paper concludes with some proposals to overcome the critical points in establishing efficient rural development policz mechanisms in the CEECs.