登入選單

返回Google圖書搜尋

Two Models of Equality and Responsibility

Michael BlakeMathias Risse

出版	SSRN, 2009
URL	http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=tYrizwEACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api

註釋

Much current thinking about justice concerns the place of responsibility within an overall account of justice. Theorists of justice such as John Rawls have been criticized for their inability to make their conclusions accord with our intuitions about responsibility. This paper argues that such criticisms are mistaken. To establish this argument, the paper introduces a distinction between indirect and direct accounts of distributive justice. Direct theories are characterized by a moralized account of the good to be distributed; indirect theories, in contrast, employ an account of the good that is morally relevant only in specific context, and then only subject to further argumentation. This distinction is employed to counter criticisms of Rawls given by John Roemer and Richard Arneson.