返回Google圖書搜尋

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-048

出版	Kansas Office of the Attorney General, 1986
URL	http://books.google.com.hk/books?id=wm2JnQAACAAJ&hl=&source=gbs_api

註釋An entity created by action of a city, a county and a chamber of commerce (which is not itself subject to either the Kansas Open Records Act or the Kansas Open Meetings Act) may be subject to both such acts if certain requirements are met. In the case of the Kansas Open Records Act (KORA), K.S.A. 45-215 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲., the entity must be supported by public funds in whole or in part. While an exception exists for the mere provision of goods or services, an entity which is established by a city and county and to which they appoint members, and which has the task of performing functions they assign, is a public agency for the purposes of KORA. Records concerning the prospective location of a business in the area may or may not be subject to disclosure, depending on whether the requirements of K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 45-221 have been met. The Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) applies if the entity is subordinate to a legislative or administrative agency of the state, and is supported in whole or in part by public funds. In the case of an entity which has a majority of its members appointed by a city and a county, which is charged with the performance of duties which would otherwise be done by the units of government themselves, and which receives funding from such governments, the tests are satisfied and KOMA applies. Questions involving the prospective location of a business in the area may be discussed in executive session only as they concern the acquisition of real property or confidential data relating to the financial affairs of the business. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 45-216; 45-217; 45-221; K.S.A. 75-4317; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4318; K.S.A. 75-4319.